In-housed ForceForm Field Report:
I see statements in which a person is describing a personal truth, an opinion, developed from the data gathered within their own system of reality perception yet with beginning and ending code assignment inclusions of collective ownership.
That is, they say ‘We all’, ‘everyone’, ‘the majority’, ‘no one’, ‘hardly anyone’, ‘all women’, ‘all millennials’, ‘no man’, and more similar. Also used are non-specific group designations such as 'People', 'we', 'humans' which, by their ambiguous nature, become encompassing of the Whole.
For example: "People should stop being so ego driven". Which "people"? All people? Some people? People who project their opinions onto large groups indiscriminately? Which people are included and which excluded in this identifying category? This is an ambiguous, non-specific and confused waveform of thought which clangs clumsily on the collective mind plates.
And in the perceived act of declaring a freedom or emancipation a person using this technique actually uploads an imposed will and belief into the human collective mind networks. This Will Imposition then broadcasts a judgement denial to any mind which does not agree with its included truth statement.
The ending result may be the polar reversal of the user’s desired intent to foster unity. These excluding statements using all-inclusive identity markers create waves and spheres of magnetised barricades on the shared plates, driving the course of mind particles. They support division, separatism, mono-directional communication, and occluded bio-feedback looping within the individual.
The person viewing from this place is experiencing on a looping reality fractal, perceiving their small range of pattern repeat as being a large geometry of many fractal pathways. They may inaccurately take as assumed knowledge that all others experiencing are looping on the same fractal set.
The overall effect for the individual is the reduced functionality of emotional empathy, with inner boundary frustration as the outer and inner truth states of the reality experience communication malfunction due to the magnetic repulsion of the broadcasting dialogue; the over expanded fields of which, having too large an inclusive category system of ‘all’ and ‘we’, are precluding the possibility of standing wave agreement with the larger Self and anOther.
That is, the small self has become isolate from the large self, and barricaded itself through layered fear and distress within membranes of coding conditions which eliminate the bulk of its larger mind and Family Group.
The target statements appear to be symptoms of malfunction at the body-form standing wave encasing membranes, and possibly have beginning cause at the mind/body enmeshing gauzes which lay just beneath the collective mind plating systems (that densely fibrous mat of collected thought which filters inbound data flows).
Observing personal dialogue, with persistent and regular conscious corrections for overly inclusive identifiers – such as replacing ‘everyone’ with ‘many people I have observed’ – could possibly create an exponentially altering waveform at the category level of consciousness thought realisation and reduce the number of reality pattern repetitions required for collective increase in access of the larger self archives. This then could reduce the Solar rotation required until the bridging jump to the next complexity of reality patterning.
That is, the reality pattern capable of housing a higher resolution of conscious understanding and enabling the embodiment housing of more portions of the ‘higher self’ within the human mind collective, could be installed with less passage of rotational time.
The individual and collective Human mind could ‘get it’ at a rate quicker than current convertible resource attrition rates. That would be preferred seeing as how the species seems pretty well stuck on repeat for a period of time which will outlast the planetary capacity for life support at present usage levels in less than 75 years, with a predictability accuracy of up to 63.5%. End Report.
The above is an individualised observation from within a personal point position and subject to location bias.
Comments